Protests were held in Serbia. The opposition is dissatisfied with the results of parliamentary elections
Details
After the victory of the current President Aleksandar Vucic's party, protests began in Belgrade. Opposition leaders Miroslav Aleksić and Marinika Tepić declared a hunger strike and demanded new elections.
According to official results, the ruling Serbian Progressive Party, which has been in power since 2012, won more than 47.36% of the vote, while the pro-Western opposition bloc Serbia Against Violence won 22.7%.
Opposition supporters reported massive irregularities and fraud in the voting and refused to recognize the election results. Tepić and Aleksić claimed that the authorities brought some 40,000 voters from other cities as well as from Republika Srpska (citizens of another state) to Belgrade to participate in the election. There were also reports of throw-ins, "carousels" and attacks on independent observers.
The rallies began late in the evening of December 18 in front of the administrative buildings in Belgrade, from where the demonstrators moved to the election commission building. Protesters threw eggs, tomatoes and toilet paper at the building. Miladin Kovačević, director of the Republican Election Commission, was attacked. According to RTC, about 1.6 thousand people took part in the protest.
Aleksandar Vucic said after the announcement of the preliminary results that the country will "continue the European path" and that Serbs will face difficult negotiations with Kosovo and "unfair concessions." He also added that Kosovo will always be part of Serbia.
Memorial to the fallen Moldovan soldiers of the Transnistrian War in Chisinau. Photo: Alexander Moisseenko
Thirty-three years ago, a ceasefire brought an end to the Transnistrian War—sometimes described by locals as the Russian-Moldovan War. Although the tensions officially ended in 1992, its consequences continue to shape Moldovan politics, society, and security — especially in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections.
Finland is moving to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, which bans anti-personnel mines. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the decision comes as a direct response to growing aggression from Russia.
The ruling Georgian Dream party has approved a set of controversial laws, including a “foreign agent” act aimed at NGOs and media. Critics say it mimics the U.S. FARA but is weaponized against dissent.
We regret to inform you that due to lack of funding we are forced to discontinue the English version of our website. This decision was not easy for us, as we have always strived to provide quality and timely information for our international audience and Russian-speaking readers. Unfortunately, the current financial realities leave us no other choice.
The Russian-language version of the site will continue to operate, but in a limited mode. We understand that this will create inconvenience for many of our readers, and we apologize for possible interruptions in the provision of news and analytical materials on this resource.
We appeal to you, our loyal readers, with a request to support our editorial staff. Your help will allow us to continue our work and provide you with important and relevant news. Please go to the support page and make your contribution to the development of independent journalism.
We thank you for your understanding and look forward to your support during this difficult time.
Memorial to the fallen Moldovan soldiers of the Transnistrian War in Chisinau. Photo: Alexander Moisseenko
Thirty-three years ago, a ceasefire brought an end to the Transnistrian War—sometimes described by locals as the Russian-Moldovan War. Although the tensions officially ended in 1992, its consequences continue to shape Moldovan politics, society, and security — especially in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections.
The Russian capital faced one of the largest terrorist attacks in its history. The terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall, which claimed the lives of many innocent people, was the second largest after the Beslan tragedy. But unlike previous attacks, this incident is shrouded in a layer of contradictory facts and ambiguities that point to possible miscalculations by the Russian security services