U.S. won't withdraw from NATO as long as Europeans pay "fairly" - Trump
Details
During his election campaign, Donald Trump said he has no intention of withdrawing the country from the North Atlantic Alliance if European countries pay their dues "fairly". Speaking on GB News TV, he stressed that America should bear its fair share of defense costs within the alliance without imposing obligations on others.
Trump compared NATO's importance to Europe to its importance to the US, pointing to America's geographical distance from European problems thanks to the Atlantic Ocean.
"There is a big and beautiful ocean between us and European problems," Trump said in stating his position on defense spending allocation.
In February, at a meeting in South Carolina, Trump said he would not defend NATO countries that fail to fulfill their financial obligations to the alliance. Trump also said he would encourage Russia to "do whatever it wants" with countries that don't pay their bills.
After Trump's remarks, Jens Stoltenberg, NATO secretary general, assured that the alliance is ready to defend all its members. Joe Biden called Trump's rhetoric dangerous. At the same time, Josep Borrell, head of EU foreign policy, called for strengthening Europe's defense capabilities, given that "the American umbrella may not always be open."
Finland is moving to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, which bans anti-personnel mines. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the decision comes as a direct response to growing aggression from Russia.
The ruling Georgian Dream party has approved a set of controversial laws, including a “foreign agent” act aimed at NGOs and media. Critics say it mimics the U.S. FARA but is weaponized against dissent.
A long-feared megaquake off Japan’s Pacific coast could cause up to $1.81 trillion in damage and kill nearly 300,000 people, according to a new government report.
We regret to inform you that due to lack of funding we are forced to discontinue the English version of our website. This decision was not easy for us, as we have always strived to provide quality and timely information for our international audience and Russian-speaking readers. Unfortunately, the current financial realities leave us no other choice.
The Russian-language version of the site will continue to operate, but in a limited mode. We understand that this will create inconvenience for many of our readers, and we apologize for possible interruptions in the provision of news and analytical materials on this resource.
We appeal to you, our loyal readers, with a request to support our editorial staff. Your help will allow us to continue our work and provide you with important and relevant news. Please go to the support page and make your contribution to the development of independent journalism.
We thank you for your understanding and look forward to your support during this difficult time.
The Russian capital faced one of the largest terrorist attacks in its history. The terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall, which claimed the lives of many innocent people, was the second largest after the Beslan tragedy. But unlike previous attacks, this incident is shrouded in a layer of contradictory facts and ambiguities that point to possible miscalculations by the Russian security services
