Mohammad Mokhber appointed interim president of Iran after the death of Ebrahim Raisi
Details
Who he is and how Mokhber may affect Iran's future and international relations.
Mohammad Mokhber, 68, Iran's first vice president, has been appointed interim president following the tragic death of Ebrahim Raisi in a helicopter crash. Mokhber, along with the speaker of parliament and the head of the judiciary, is part of a council that will organize new presidential elections within 50 days.
Like Raisi, Mokhber is considered close to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who has the final say in all state affairs. In 2021, Mokhber became the first vice president when Raisi was elected president.
Mokhber is also known for being part of a group of Iranian officials who visited Moscow in October to finalize agreements to supply surface-to-surface missiles and drones to the Russian military. He previously headed Setad, an investment fund linked to Iran's supreme leader.
In 2013, the U.S. Treasury Department placed the Setad fund and 37 companies under its control on the list of sanctioned entities.
Recall, the helicopter in which Raisi and high-ranking Iranian officials were flying crashed on May 19 in the province of East Azerbaijan, in northwestern Iran. All passengers were killed in the crash, including, as reported by Mehr news agency and the head of the Iranian Foreign Ministry. A total of eight people were on board, including members of the presidential security service and crew members. The causes of the crash have not yet been reported, an investigation is underway.
Memorial to the fallen Moldovan soldiers of the Transnistrian War in Chisinau. Photo: Alexander Moisseenko
Thirty-three years ago, a ceasefire brought an end to the Transnistrian War—sometimes described by locals as the Russian-Moldovan War. Although the tensions officially ended in 1992, its consequences continue to shape Moldovan politics, society, and security — especially in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections.
Finland is moving to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, which bans anti-personnel mines. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the decision comes as a direct response to growing aggression from Russia.
The ruling Georgian Dream party has approved a set of controversial laws, including a “foreign agent” act aimed at NGOs and media. Critics say it mimics the U.S. FARA but is weaponized against dissent.
We regret to inform you that due to lack of funding we are forced to discontinue the English version of our website. This decision was not easy for us, as we have always strived to provide quality and timely information for our international audience and Russian-speaking readers. Unfortunately, the current financial realities leave us no other choice.
The Russian-language version of the site will continue to operate, but in a limited mode. We understand that this will create inconvenience for many of our readers, and we apologize for possible interruptions in the provision of news and analytical materials on this resource.
We appeal to you, our loyal readers, with a request to support our editorial staff. Your help will allow us to continue our work and provide you with important and relevant news. Please go to the support page and make your contribution to the development of independent journalism.
We thank you for your understanding and look forward to your support during this difficult time.
Memorial to the fallen Moldovan soldiers of the Transnistrian War in Chisinau. Photo: Alexander Moisseenko
Thirty-three years ago, a ceasefire brought an end to the Transnistrian War—sometimes described by locals as the Russian-Moldovan War. Although the tensions officially ended in 1992, its consequences continue to shape Moldovan politics, society, and security — especially in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections.
The Russian capital faced one of the largest terrorist attacks in its history. The terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall, which claimed the lives of many innocent people, was the second largest after the Beslan tragedy. But unlike previous attacks, this incident is shrouded in a layer of contradictory facts and ambiguities that point to possible miscalculations by the Russian security services