UN International Court of Justice demands Israel halt Rafah operation
Details
Photo: Reuters
“The IDF's actions in the Gaza Strip fall under the definition of genocide.”
The court was hearing a lawsuit by representatives of South Africa today. The country said the IDF operation, which the military launched on May 7, 2024, threatens “the last refuge for 1.5 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.”
Among other things, the Africans blamed the IDF for the “complete collapse of infrastructure, sewage, water and food supplies.” South Africa insists that “all of these actions fall under the definition of genocide.”
The court in The Hague, citing “imminent danger to the Palestinian people,” ruled that Israel must immediately halt the military operation in Rafah. The court ruled in favor of the prosecution by a majority of 13 votes in favor to two against.
The court expressed doubts that Israel's measures were sufficient to protect civilians in the Gaza Strip and ordered Israel to allow international investigators access to the Strip.
Israel, expectedly, rejected the accusations and noted that Rafah remains a military stronghold of Hamas, which continues to pose a significant threat to the state of Israel and its citizens. Jerusalem also said it was allowing necessary humanitarian supplies into the Gaza Strip.
Recall, in December last year, South Africa filed a lawsuit against Israel at the International Court of Justice in the UN in The Hague. The document alleges that the IDF's actions in Gaza have “the character of genocide.” Israel rejected the accusations and called them unfounded.
Memorial to the fallen Moldovan soldiers of the Transnistrian War in Chisinau. Photo: Alexander Moisseenko
Thirty-three years ago, a ceasefire brought an end to the Transnistrian War—sometimes described by locals as the Russian-Moldovan War. Although the tensions officially ended in 1992, its consequences continue to shape Moldovan politics, society, and security — especially in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections.
Finland is moving to withdraw from the Ottawa Convention, which bans anti-personnel mines. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the decision comes as a direct response to growing aggression from Russia.
The ruling Georgian Dream party has approved a set of controversial laws, including a “foreign agent” act aimed at NGOs and media. Critics say it mimics the U.S. FARA but is weaponized against dissent.
We regret to inform you that due to lack of funding we are forced to discontinue the English version of our website. This decision was not easy for us, as we have always strived to provide quality and timely information for our international audience and Russian-speaking readers. Unfortunately, the current financial realities leave us no other choice.
The Russian-language version of the site will continue to operate, but in a limited mode. We understand that this will create inconvenience for many of our readers, and we apologize for possible interruptions in the provision of news and analytical materials on this resource.
We appeal to you, our loyal readers, with a request to support our editorial staff. Your help will allow us to continue our work and provide you with important and relevant news. Please go to the support page and make your contribution to the development of independent journalism.
We thank you for your understanding and look forward to your support during this difficult time.
Memorial to the fallen Moldovan soldiers of the Transnistrian War in Chisinau. Photo: Alexander Moisseenko
Thirty-three years ago, a ceasefire brought an end to the Transnistrian War—sometimes described by locals as the Russian-Moldovan War. Although the tensions officially ended in 1992, its consequences continue to shape Moldovan politics, society, and security — especially in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections.
The Russian capital faced one of the largest terrorist attacks in its history. The terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall, which claimed the lives of many innocent people, was the second largest after the Beslan tragedy. But unlike previous attacks, this incident is shrouded in a layer of contradictory facts and ambiguities that point to possible miscalculations by the Russian security services
